In your opinion, can a judge limit a suspect's right to defense by his decision, in particular, prohibit him from communicating with an unspecified group of people? Isn't such a restriction a violation of the suspect's fundamental rights?
If Ukraine receives additional long-range weapons from the US and uses them to strike Russia's energy infrastructure, will this be considered a violation of international law on my part as a citizen of Ukraine?
If a doctor performed surgery on me despite contraindications, and this led to a deterioration in my health, can I demand compensation from him for the damage caused?
What is your opinion on the decision of the High Council of Justice regarding the disciplinary action against the judge of the Supreme Judicial Council of Ukraine, Viktor Maslov, who forbade the suspect from communicating with "everyone in the world"? Do you think that such a decision could affect judicial practice in Ukraine regarding the observance of the right to defense?
I am following the news about the trial of former French President Nicolas Sarkozy, who was found guilty of criminal complicity in the case of illegally financing his 2007 election campaign with funds from the regime of Libyan dictator Muammar Gaddafi. Could I get into legal trouble if I receive funding for my election campaign from foreign sources?
If I see a Russian drone over my city, do I have a duty to report it to the authorities, and what are the consequences if I don't?
If Volodymyr Zelenskyy does indeed resign after the war ends, will this mean that presidential elections will automatically be held?
After the publication of an article about contacts between Donald Trump and Ursula von der Leyen, the question arose about the responsibility of a civil servant who refuses to sign an important document. Can he invoke his right to free will if his superiors demand that he sign a document that goes against his beliefs?
If a man in Poland sticks an inscription on a sign with the name of a square, can he be held liable under Polish law? Is there a fine or restriction of liberty in such a case?
Do you think it is possible to use artificial intelligence in domestic legal proceedings to analyze case materials and summarize the arguments of the parties?