If the court overturned the decision to secure the claim by suspending the effect of the regulatory legal act, does this mean that the plaintiff automatically loses the right to further consideration of his case on the merits?
Do I believe that the simultaneous imposition of an arrest on the defendant's movable and immovable property and funds constitutes double security for the claim or a violation of the principle of proportionality of measures to secure the claim with the stated claims?
Is a court ruling refusing to grant an application for securing a claim subject to appeal if such a ruling was issued during the consideration of a criminal offense case?