Good evening, the person has the following ""Diagnosis: Anomaly of the urinary system. Aplasia of the right kidney. SKX. Calculus of the left ureter of the only functioning left kidney. Renal colic on the left. Oligoanuria. Chronic calculous pyelonephritis in the latent stage. The head of the wolf interprets this disease according to p.b, art. 67 502 of the order of the Ministry of Health and issues a conclusion about the suitability of the person in the parts of providing tsk and sp, etc., but the head of the police department is a doctor with a university specialty in the field of neurology, and clearly does not understand the essence of the diagnosis, therefore, as p.b, article 67 according to appendix number 2 to the order of Moza 402 says the following ...
Appendix 2
to the Regulation on military medical examination in the Armed Forces of Ukraine (clause 1.2 of chapter 1 of section II)
EXPLANATION
on the application of articles
Schedule of diseases, conditions and
physical defects that determine
degree of suitability to
military service
1) point "a" includes:
diseases accompanied by significant disorders of the excretory function of the kidneys or CKD 2-4 degrees;
urolithiasis with damage to both kidneys with unsatisfactory treatment results that are not amenable to surgical treatment;
bilateral nephroptosis of the III stage with significant functional disorders;
renal pelvic dystonia with significant dysfunction;
the absence of one kidney, removed due to diseases, in the presence of any degree of dysfunction of the second kidney.
That is, from the above and the diagnosis of the person, it can be seen that he has one kidney missing and the other has a functional disorder, which falls under any degree specified in the explanations and the article of point "A" itself.
The head of the VLK, either not familiar with appendix number 2 to 402 of the order of the Ministry of Health, or deliberately ignoring the current order and exceeding his authority for the purpose of an unknown person in respect of whom the recruitment committee is considering, may be biased, or negligently applies paragraph B of this appendix and the provisions of the Article 67, which says...
2) point "b" includes:
urolithiasis with frequent (2 or more times a year) attacks of renal colic, independent passage of stones and significant or moderate renal dysfunction;
a non-functioning kidney or the absence of one kidney, removed for 3 reasons of diseases, without impaired functions of the second kidney;
at the same time, he does not take into account that the person has one kidney with significant dysfunction, that is, aplasia of the right kidney does not mean anything to him, and that the diagnosis itself is based on the only problematic kidney that the person has.
In addition, the person has bronchial asthma of moderate severity, and a number of other chronic diseases
Question: What article should the VLK have applied?