I read the news that Donald Trump announced the arrest of the suspect in the murder of Charlie Kirk. I wonder if Ukrainian justice will be as effective in the event of a similar crime in Ukraine? Will they be able to quickly arrest the suspect?
If a person planned a terrorist act near the Trade Center and was detained, can they be held responsible for an attempted terrorist act if the terrorist act itself did not take place?
In our wartime, is there a punishment under the laws of Ukraine if a person is on the territory of Ukraine and is engaged in attempts to hack, duddos or otherwise cause harm to sites from the Russian Federation? If not, where in the law can this be seen? If so, have you ever had experiences where you were punished for this? I know there are many “people’s cyber armies” that do this, but I don’t know how it is regulated by law
I have a question regarding the case of Iryna Zarutska, a Ukrainian woman who was murdered in the U.S. Does Ukrainian law provide for liability for crimes committed against Ukrainian citizens abroad, and can DeCarlos Brown Jr. be held liable for this?
...to avoid criminal liability due to the expiration of the statute of limitations?
I am interested in how Ukraine qualifies a case like the one in Austria, where a man attacked a woman because of her religion and tried to force-feed her pork. What articles of the Criminal Code of Ukraine can be applied in a similar situation?
If a citizen of Ukraine was detained in another country on the basis of a European arrest warrant issued by a court of another state, can he be extradited to that state for criminal prosecution?
Do you think the suspect in Izmail intended to harm a specific person or was it a general terrorist act?
Is the assassination attempt on the head of the Security Service of Ukraine, Vasyl Malyuk, by launching Iskander missiles considered a war crime under Ukrainian law?
Are minors and their parents responsible for terrorist acts organized at the behest of Russian intelligence services? I want to know what punishment is provided for minors who commit terrorist acts.
If a person refuses to receive a notification of suspicion, is he considered to have been properly notified if there is a video recording of this action?
I don't understand how minors suspected of preparing a terrorist attack were given a preventive measure in the form of detention without the right to post bail - doesn't this contradict the norms of the legislation on the criminal responsibility of minors?