I am interested in your opinion on whether Bohdan Lvov's actions, which consisted of providing instructions to the judges in the "Medvedchuk Pipes" case, can be considered to be in accordance with the law and the norms of judicial procedure?
I am interested in whether the practice of regular evaluation of judges, which the HQCJ plans to introduce, contradicts the principles of judicial independence and whether it can affect the objectivity of judicial decisions? Is this evaluation considered legal from the point of view of Ukrainian legislation?
I am interested in whether foreign experts who will assist the HQCJ with verifying the integrity of candidates for the positions of judges of the new Specialized District Administrative Court and the Specialized Administrative Court of Appeal will be able to objectively assess their integrity, given that some of them have already participated in similar processes in Ukraine and have certain experience and reputation.
The article tells about foreign experts who will participate in the verification of the integrity of candidates for the positions of judges of the new Specialized District Administrative Court and the Specialized Administrative Court of Appeal. Some of these experts already had experience working in Ukraine, but questions arise about the results of their activities. Do you think that such a mechanism involving foreign experts will help ensure transparency and objectivity of the process of selecting judges?
I am interested in whether other individuals who followed Ihor Kolomoisky's instructions to seize the bank's assets can be held accountable. What liability is provided for individuals who acted on his instructions? Do they need to prove that they acted on Kolomoisky's orders to avoid liability?
What is your opinion on the decision of the High Council of Justice regarding the disciplinary action against the judge of the Supreme Judicial Council of Ukraine, Viktor Maslov, who forbade the suspect from communicating with "everyone in the world"? Do you think that such a decision could affect judicial practice in Ukraine regarding the observance of the right to defense?