06.09.2025 08:35
Universal methodology for evaluating judges
Do I believe that unifying the requirements for candidates for the positions of judges of different instances is fair?
Read full question
#universal methodology
Similar questions
25.09.2025 21:30
Qualification assessment of judges
If the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine has not confirmed the suitability of a judge for the position held, does the High Council of Justice have the right to cancel the decision of the HQCJ on submitting a petition for dismissal from the position held?
Read full question
29.09.2025 08:10
Regular evaluation of judges: questions of legality
I am interested in whether the practice of regular evaluation of judges, which the HQCJ plans to introduce, contradicts the principles of judicial independence and whether it can affect the objectivity of judicial decisions? Is this evaluation considered legal from the point of view of Ukrainian legislation?
Read full question
26.09.2025 07:55
Questions about evaluating judges
Do you think it meets the requirements of the law and ensures impartiality for representatives of public associations to evaluate a judge's "knowledge of the case" during the consideration of a case without being familiar with the details of the case?
Read full question
01.09.2025 10:50
Regular evaluation of judges
What legal consequences may there be for a judge if he refuses to participate in regular evaluation under the new Regulations?
Read full question
03.09.2025 16:15
Unified methodology for evaluating judges
I am trying to understand whether the changes in the evaluation of candidates for judicial positions will apply to existing judges. Will they be able to appeal the results of previous evaluations?
Read full question