Rights of applicants to postgraduate studies
If I notice an error in my data after applying for a postgraduate course online, can I correct it? And what if I am unable to do so due to technical problems?
If I notice an error in my data after applying for a postgraduate course online, can I correct it? And what if I am unable to do so due to technical problems?
If I receive a tax assessment, but it is registered late due to technical problems at the tax office, will I be able to use it as evidence in court?
Are there any restrictions on the choice of vehicle for taking the practical driving test? What should be done if the driving school refuses to provide a vehicle for the exam?
Are there really restrictions on resuming university studies after 25 years that make it impossible to obtain a deferment from mobilization, and are there legal ways to circumvent them?
If I did not pass the NMT due to circumstances beyond my control, will I be able to enroll in a "zero course" at the university and what are the conditions for this?
If I am not admitted to a university due to a lack of places, do I have the right to appeal? Can I go to court if I believe the admission decision was unfair?
If I file a claim with the court, do I have to include all the evidence I am citing in my claim, or can I submit it later? How will this affect the consideration of my case?
If a lawyer develops tax evasion schemes, can he be held liable under Ukrainian law? I mean, are there any specific rules or laws that regulate this situation.
If I received a tax notice and consider it unlawful, do I have the right to be present in person when my complaint is considered by a higher-level regulatory authority?
If a video with my participation or statements that could be regarded as calls to violate national security are published on the Internet, can investigative authorities use screenshots of these materials as evidence in criminal proceedings against me?
The Supreme Court reviewed a case where tax authorities tried to prove a violation using information from the internet. The court ruled that information from the Internet network without confirmed sources is not proper evidence. Does this mean that in all similar cases, information from the internet will be inadmissible as evidence?