Admissibility of evidence involving specialists
Can an investigator involve a specialist in investigative actions if that specialist lacks the required special knowledge and skills, and will the evidence obtained be considered admissible?
Can an investigator involve a specialist in investigative actions if that specialist lacks the required special knowledge and skills, and will the evidence obtained be considered admissible?
How is the liability of doctors determined in the case of a medical error during the treatment of children? Does the legislation of Ukraine provide for liability for failure to comply with or improper implementation of medical standards?
Can a verdict against an accomplice in a criminal offense have a prejudicial effect on the case of another defendant if they did not participate in the proceedings against the accomplice?
If a video with my participation or statements that could be regarded as calls to violate national security are published on the Internet, can investigative authorities use screenshots of these materials as evidence in criminal proceedings against me?
I'm curious: if a person's signature and handwriting samples were taken while they were still a witness, and then they became a defendant, will the expert's conclusion be admissible evidence in court?
If the prosecution obtains evidence through temporary access to items and documents from another criminal proceeding that was not consolidated with the main proceeding, do you consider such evidence admissible?