#explain

09.01.2024 17:39

What does 'by special order' mean?

Good day! In 2022, he came to the TCC to register on his own. At my request, they gave me a "summons", took away my temporary license, gave me a "runner" to the hospital, and with that they told me to pass the VLK commission. After passing the commission (Limited eligibility for two articles), I returned to the TCC, where they took the "runner" with the conclusion of the VLK, and on the summons, they wrote "to a special appointment" in red pen. They told me to carry it with me and show it as proof that I am registered. They also gave a Temporary Certificate, but nothing was written there. When asked why? They answered - "then, sometime after the war." The question is, does that summons with the inscription on the special appointment have any "legal" force somewhere other than my district? (In another city, etc.. Because twice during this time the employees of the TCC of my district approached me and immediately let me go with the words - "ah. you have something special...") And in general, can you clarify the situation a little or do I have to do something etc.. Thank you!

Read full question

Similar questions

30.08.2025 09:05

Liability for failure to comply with an order

Do you believe that a serviceman should be held accountable for failure to comply with an order if he reported the impossibility of compliance due to health conditions, but did not provide the relevant documents when receiving the order?

Read full question
10.08.2024 16:53

Questions on Order 402 and Appendix 2 to it

Good evening, the person has the following ""Diagnosis: Anomaly of the urinary system. Aplasia of the right kidney. SKX. Calculus of the left ureter of the only functioning left kidney. Renal colic on the left. Oligoanuria. Chronic calculous pyelonephritis in the latent stage. The head of the wolf interprets this disease according to p.b, art. 67 502 of the order of the Ministry of Health and issues a conclusion about the suitability of the person in the parts of providing tsk and sp, etc., but the head of the police department is a doctor with a university specialty in the field of neurology, and clearly does not understand the essence of the diagnosis, therefore, as p.b, article 67 according to appendix number 2 to the order of Moza 402 says the following ... Appendix 2 to the Regulation on military medical examination in the Armed Forces of Ukraine (clause 1.2 of chapter 1 of section II) EXPLANATION on the application of articles Schedule of diseases, conditions and physical defects that determine degree of suitability to military service Article 67: 1) point "a" includes: diseases accompanied by significant disorders of the excretory function of the kidneys or CKD 2-4 degrees; urolithiasis with damage to both kidneys with unsatisfactory treatment results that are not amenable to surgical treatment; bilateral nephroptosis of the III stage with significant functional disorders; renal pelvic dystonia with significant dysfunction; the absence of one kidney, removed due to diseases, in the presence of any degree of dysfunction of the second kidney. That is, from the above and the diagnosis of the person, it can be seen that he has one kidney missing and the other has a functional disorder, which falls under any degree specified in the explanations and the article of point "A" itself. The head of the VLK, either not familiar with appendix number 2 to 402 of the order of the Ministry of Health, or deliberately ignoring the current order and exceeding his authority for the purpose of an unknown person in respect of whom the recruitment committee is considering, may be biased, or negligently applies paragraph B of this appendix and the provisions of the Article 67, which says... 2) point "b" includes: urolithiasis with frequent (2 or more times a year) attacks of renal colic, independent passage of stones and significant or moderate renal dysfunction; a non-functioning kidney or the absence of one kidney, removed for 3 reasons of diseases, without impaired functions of the second kidney; at the same time, he does not take into account that the person has one kidney with significant dysfunction, that is, aplasia of the right kidney does not mean anything to him, and that the diagnosis itself is based on the only problematic kidney that the person has. In addition, the person has bronchial asthma of moderate severity, and a number of other chronic diseases Question: What article should the VLK have applied?

Read full question
25.07.2023 10:12

Is the PENSION card account a special account in the context of...?

....executive proceedings? What regulations regulate this? What are the accounts (examples) that cannot be levied or seized?

Read full question
02.07.2023 17:26

Will the postponement, which has already been issued until the end of the special...?

... period?

Read full question
31.01.2024 22:12

Will reissuance by order be considered as a sale?

If a part of the apartment is donated by general assignment - will this be taken into account in the next sale of other real estate?

Read full question