I want to know whether the commander of a military unit is responsible for using subordinates to build his private house during the war, if he issued orders for them to perform combat missions in official documents?
If the police stopped a driver and accused him of drug use without sufficient grounds, and then took him to the CCC instead of a medical examination, can their actions be considered legal?
If a serviceman believes that a commander is illegally demanding a bribe or violating his rights, can he challenge these actions in court?
If a military unit commander sends a subordinate to a government agency where he is not performing his duties and receives financial support, is this considered abuse of power?
If a military unit commander hid the fact of a subordinate's suicide and received a payment because of it, will he be held liable for the inaction of the military authorities under the legislation of Ukraine? Can he be charged with intentional failure to perform his official duties?
What if he returned to service through the "Army+" application after the NSC, but did not pass the check at the VSP within 24 hours after the report was approved? I want to know whether the actions of a serviceman who returned to service after the NSC will be considered a violation of military service rules.
Three servicemen in the Kyiv region sold fuel from their unit, causing losses of $23 thousand. They were reported on suspicion of large-scale embezzlement of diesel fuel. How can I qualify the actions of these individuals according to the law?
How can the High Anti-Corruption Court confiscate the property of a police officer and his family in favor of the state if the assets were not registered in his name?
I am driving without a license and have been stopped by the police. Is there any way I can appeal their actions in stopping my car if they did not provide a detailed reason for doing so?
If the police apply psychological pressure on the driver when drawing up the report, can such a report be appealed in court? I mean, if the driver did not commit an offense, but was forced to sign the report under pressure from the police.
Do the police have the authority to seize objects in the event of violations that threaten public safety, if these actions do not directly relate to the subject matter of the dispute in the case?
If the police unreasonably demand that the driver admit to a traffic violation under the threat of being taken to the Traffic Police, can their actions be appealed in court?