Do you think it is correct?
That not all persons who are reported as suspected of corruption crimes receive guilty verdicts? Should all corruption suspects necessarily receive verdicts?
That not all persons who are reported as suspected of corruption crimes receive guilty verdicts? Should all corruption suspects necessarily receive verdicts?
If a video with my participation or statements that could be regarded as calls to violate national security are published on the Internet, can investigative authorities use screenshots of these materials as evidence in criminal proceedings against me?
If I file a claim with the court, do I have to include all the evidence I am citing in my claim, or can I submit it later? How will this affect the consideration of my case?
If the tax notice-decision was not received by the taxpayer, does this fact affect the start of the period for filing a lawsuit, if the existence of such a decision is known?
What is your opinion on the decision of the High Council of Justice regarding the disciplinary action against the judge of the Supreme Judicial Council of Ukraine, Viktor Maslov, who forbade the suspect from communicating with "everyone in the world"? Do you think that such a decision could affect judicial practice in Ukraine regarding the observance of the right to defense?
Do you believe that the decision of the Disciplinary Chamber of the Supreme Court of Justice to refuse to open a disciplinary case against a judge can be appealed to court by the person who filed a complaint against the actions of this judge?