In your opinion, can a judge limit a suspect's right to defense by his decision, in particular, prohibit him from communicating with an unspecified group of people? Isn't such a restriction a violation of the suspect's fundamental rights?
I read an article about how the High Council of Justice upheld the disciplinary action against HCJ judge Viktor Maslov, who forbade a suspect from communicating with “everyone in the world.” I’m curious, do you think judges have the right to restrict a suspect’s right to defense in this way? Do you consider this a violation of fundamental human rights?
If a judge spreads pro-Russian narratives, can his actions be considered a violation of the Law 'On the Judiciary and the Status of Judges', and what consequences could this have for him?
Do you believe that a judge has the right to prohibit a suspect from communicating with an unspecified group of people if this could significantly limit his right to defense?
In your opinion, can a judge restrict a suspect's right to communicate with any persons if such a restriction effectively prohibits him from contacting international organizations, communicating with other state bodies, or even choosing a new lawyer?
Do you think a judge has the right to criticize others using obscene language during public speeches?
How can I protect myself from threats if I work as a judge? Are there any special protection mechanisms for judges in Ukraine?
According to the case under consideration, the judge of the Supreme Court of Justice Viktor Maslov forbade the suspect from communicating with “everyone in the world,” which was recognized by the High Council of Justice as a violation of the right to defense. I believe that judges should follow the law and indicate specific individuals in their decisions. Do you share this opinion?