If a person committed a crime while in a state of limited sanity, can the court take this condition into account when determining punishment and apply coercive medical measures? For example, if a person suffers from schizophrenia and committed a serious crime.
Does the adoption of a bill to deprive psychiatric institutions of the right to bring before the court the issue of restricting the legal capacity of a sick person mean that now my loved one who has mental problems will not be able to restrict his legal capacity without his consent?
Do you think it is necessary to retain the right of psychiatric institutions to file applications with the court to restrict the civil capacity of an individual?
If a person commits a new crime during the probationary period, is the court required to impose a final sentence based on the totality of the sentences if the previous sentence was imposed in the form of imprisonment and the new sentence was imposed in the form of a fine?
I am interested in whether it is possible to appeal the decision of the appellate court to impose a real sentence instead of a suspended sentence if the decision of the court of first instance was made on the basis of the defendant's admission of guilt?
If a serviceman does not carry out the commander's order, do you think it is fair for him to receive a real punishment in the form of a prison sentence of 5 to 10 years without the possibility of a lighter sentence or probation?