I recently read a statement by Trump that the US continues to sell NATO weapons to Ukraine, whereas the previous administration provided them for free. I am interested in whether this practice of selling weapons during a conflict complies with international law?
The EU has developed counter-proposals to the US peace plan for Ukraine. What does this mean for our country and can these proposals influence further negotiations on settling the war?
How can Russia's actions regarding the use of various types of weapons against Ukraine be qualified from the perspective of international humanitarian law?
How can Ukraine protect the rights of foreigners who were illegally involved in the war on the side of the RF, and will they be held accountable?
As I understand it, international law does not always work effectively if a country does not have influential allies or sufficient weapons to defend itself. Does this mean that Ukraine should develop its own weapons to protect its interests?
I want to know whether the use of weapons provided by the US to strike targets deep inside Russian territory is considered legal from the point of view of Ukrainian legislation and international law?
If a citizen of Ukraine permanently resides abroad and has real estate in Ukraine, can he be called up for military service during martial law?
Given the information about a possible meeting between the leaders of Ukraine, the United States, and Russia, does international law oblige Ukraine to participate in such negotiations if they concern its territorial integrity and sovereignty?
I am wondering whether supplying weapons to Ukraine could be considered a violation of international law if these weapons are used to defend against an aggressor. I am concerned about this situation because I want to understand what consequences this could have for Ukraine and its allies.
The US has proposed a new peace plan for Ukraine, which consists of 28 points. EU and NATO leaders have already expressed their position on this plan, noting that it could serve as a basis for further negotiations but requires significant clarification and revision. What legal consequences could the implementation of this plan have for Ukraine?
How will the US peace plan for Ukraine be implemented if most Ukrainian priorities are already included in the current version of the document?
What will happen if the new peace plan for Ukraine, proposed by the USA, does not align with Ukrainian national interests and the Constitution of Ukraine?
What happens if the new peace plan proposed by the USA fails or is declared invalid by other countries or international organizations?
EU and NATO leaders criticize the US peace plan for Ukraine, believing that it requires significant revisions. What does this mean for Ukraine and its future?