#illicit benefit

20.11.2025 12:45

The Supreme Court and liability for undue advantage

What is the significance of the Supreme Court's decision that the actions of an official after receiving an undue advantage have no legal relevance for the qualification of the crime under Part 3 of Article 368 of the CC of Ukraine?

Read full question

Similar questions

19.09.2025 12:15

Supreme Court and procedural costs

If the criminal proceedings against me were closed due to the loss of validity of the law that established the criminal illegality of the act, can this be a basis for exempting me from paying procedural costs associated with conducting a forensic examination in favor of the state?

Read full question
22.09.2025 21:45

Justification at the Supreme Court

If a person is acquitted due to lack of evidence of a crime, can they claim compensation for moral damage caused during the investigation?

Read full question
23.09.2025 19:00

Illicit enrichment: questions of liability

I want to understand whether a close person who purchased property on behalf of a deputy can avoid liability for illicit enrichment if it is proven that they acted solely on the instructions of the deputy?

Read full question
24.11.2025 16:00

Vindication immunity in the enforcement of court decisions

What does the decision of the Cassation Economic Court of the Supreme Court on “vindication immunity” mean regarding property sold at electronic auctions during the enforcement of court decisions? Can a bona fide purchaser be confident in their rights when acquiring such property?

Read full question
28.09.2025 14:05

The Supreme Court and official negligence

If an official who checks certain documentation before the commission makes a decision on the allocation of budget funds fails to fulfill his duties due to dishonesty, and this leads to an illegal decision and material losses to the state, can he be held responsible for these consequences?

Read full question