Will the High Qualification Commission of Judges ensure transparency in the assessment of practical tasks for candidates for the position of judge in the High Anti-Corruption Court by publishing their work and detailed scores?
Do you think that introducing regular evaluation of judges with public involvement will improve the quality of justice?
I read the news that the High Council of Justice has once again extended the deadline for accepting documents from candidates for the position of the Head of the State Judicial Service. I am wondering whether a member of the HQCJ or the Supreme Judicial Council can be held liable if they do not comply with the requirements of the law when evaluating judges?
Do I believe that unifying the requirements for candidates for the positions of judges of different instances is fair?
I am trying to understand whether the changes in the evaluation of candidates for judicial positions will apply to existing judges. Will they be able to appeal the results of previous evaluations?
What legal consequences may there be for a judge if he refuses to participate in regular evaluation under the new Regulations?
Do you think that changes to the composition of the chambers of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine may affect the quality of the evaluation of judges?