Questions about the legality of police actions
If the police stopped a driver and accused him of drug use without sufficient grounds, and then took him to the CCC instead of a medical examination, can their actions be considered legal?
If the police stopped a driver and accused him of drug use without sufficient grounds, and then took him to the CCC instead of a medical examination, can their actions be considered legal?
How can the High Anti-Corruption Court confiscate the property of a police officer and his family in favor of the state if the assets were not registered in his name?
I am driving without a license and have been stopped by the police. Is there any way I can appeal their actions in stopping my car if they did not provide a detailed reason for doing so?
If the police apply psychological pressure on the driver when drawing up the report, can such a report be appealed in court? I mean, if the driver did not commit an offense, but was forced to sign the report under pressure from the police.
Do the police have the authority to seize objects in the event of violations that threaten public safety, if these actions do not directly relate to the subject matter of the dispute in the case?
If the police unreasonably demand that the driver admit to a traffic violation under the threat of being taken to the Traffic Police, can their actions be appealed in court?