Precautionary measure
Do I believe that the preventive measure of detention without bail is effective in preventing witness influence in the Ruslan Magomedrasulov case?
Do I believe that the preventive measure of detention without bail is effective in preventing witness influence in the Ruslan Magomedrasulov case?
I want to know whether there is liability for untimely sending warnings about danger, for example, during a drone attack, as in the case of Poland, when the message only arrived in the morning, although the attack began at night?
I am curious whether there is a mechanism for appealing the decision to impose a preventive measure for persons who have been notified of suspicion of committing a criminal offense, for example, under Part 4 of Article 240 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine?
In your opinion, was the court's decision to choose a preventive measure in the form of night house arrest for the suspect in gang rape sufficiently justified, given the gravity of the crime and the prosecutor's demands for detention?
If a minibus driver admitted his guilt in a fatal accident, can he avoid criminal liability? Is the court obliged to apply the maximum penalty in such cases?
Do you think the court correctly chose a preventive measure in the form of detention for a former teacher suspected of murdering two students?