I recently read a statement by Trump that the US continues to sell NATO weapons to Ukraine, whereas the previous administration provided them for free. I am interested in whether this practice of selling weapons during a conflict complies with international law?
As I understand it, international law does not always work effectively if a country does not have influential allies or sufficient weapons to defend itself. Does this mean that Ukraine should develop its own weapons to protect its interests?
I want to know whether the use of weapons provided by the US to strike targets deep inside Russian territory is considered legal from the point of view of Ukrainian legislation and international law?
If a citizen of Ukraine permanently resides abroad and has real estate in Ukraine, can he be called up for military service during martial law?
Given the information about a possible meeting between the leaders of Ukraine, the United States, and Russia, does international law oblige Ukraine to participate in such negotiations if they concern its territorial integrity and sovereignty?
I am wondering whether supplying weapons to Ukraine could be considered a violation of international law if these weapons are used to defend against an aggressor. I am concerned about this situation because I want to understand what consequences this could have for Ukraine and its allies.