There is court case 240/71/23, according to which the court found illegal and canceled the decision of the Department of Social Affairs. protection of the population about the refusal to provide housing assistance to an IDP, i.e. my mother.
They did not file an appeal, my mother filled out an application, accepted it, and did not appoint a payment again. No written refusal was given. What should we do with these defenders of the population?
... the decision is in my favor, that is, the existing privatization must be canceled and I have the first right to the privatization of the land.
But, since the land was used by the people of the garden society, there are still separate plaintiffs with the same lawsuit, but who chose a different lawyer, and the trial in their case is still ongoing, first there was a local court, where the defendants filed an appeal and won it, then those the plaintiffs brought the case to the Supreme Court.
So here is the question:
I have to wait until the other plaintiffs win the case, can't I, with the decision of my court case, cancel the seizure of land, illegal privatization and start privatization for myself?