Do you think it is justified for the government to block access to social media during mass protests, as happened in Nepal, if it threatens freedom of speech and human rights violations?
Do you believe that blocking social media by a country's government can be a basis for restricting freedom of speech, and should such a decision be subject to judicial review?
Do you consider it justified for another country's government to block social media due to companies' refusal to comply with new registration and licensing rules if such actions could limit citizens' freedom of speech and communication opportunities?
If a foreign regulator requires American internet platforms to comply with its laws on freedom of speech, can this be considered interference in the internal affairs of the United States? I believe that such influence may violate the rights of American citizens to freedom of speech. Should the Ukrainian regulator take measures to protect the rights of Ukrainian internet users in such cases?